It is considered impossible to do what during the analysis of friction ridge prints?

During the analysis of friction ridge prints, it is deemed impossible to describe every discrepancy present in the prints due to the complex and often varied nature of these features. Friction ridge patterns, which include the unique ridges found on fingers and palms, can exhibit a wide array of characteristics and irregularities that may not be fully captured during analysis.

The analysis requires a careful examination of the overall features, but given that prints can be smudged, partial, or distorted, it becomes challenging to detail every single inconsistency that might exist across the print. While examiners strive to identify and document notable discrepancies, the inherent limitations in the print's quality and the variability in ridge features mean that some discrepancies may not be recognized or articulated comprehensively.

In contrast, quantifying every ridge feature is a more attainable goal, as examiners can systematically measure and record identifiable ridge details when analyzing prints. Identifying all types of patterns is also possible, as there are standardized classifications that help analysts categorize and recognize common ridge formations. Predicting outcomes can also be done with a degree of accuracy based on the established methodologies and similarities found in prints, although there's always an element of uncertainty due to potential variances in quality and context. Thus, the impossibility mainly lies